β β β β β 4.9/5
We put Leonardo AI through real prompts and real credit spending. The output impressed us β the billing practices did not.
We'll say this upfront: Leonardo AI is genuinely good at making images. In our testing, generation speed was fast β we're talking seconds, not the agonizing waits some competitors put you through β and the model selection is deep enough that you can jump between photorealistic, illustrative, and stylized outputs without leaving the app. For anyone comparing it to Midjourney on price alone, Leonardo comes out ahead. We also found the daily free credit allotment genuinely useful for testing prompts before committing real money, which is more generous than most tools in this space offer.
When we reached out with a technical issue during testing, support was quick and helpful, which counts for something in a category where most AI apps treat customer service as an afterthought.
Here's where our enthusiasm cooled. We ran into the same 'something went wrong' failure that seems to plague generation runs β credits spent, nothing produced, no clear explanation. That's not a rare edge case in our experience; it happened often enough to be a real pattern, and it's compounded by a credit-expiration system that feels engineered to extract extra payment rather than reward loyal use.
Prompt adherence was inconsistent too. We tested specific, detailed prompts and got results that missed key details more often than we'd like β asking for a fairly narrow visual concept sometimes returned something only loosely related. Character and image-to-image consistency across iterations was shakier than we expected from a tool at this price point.
Video generation is the weakest link by a wide margin. If you're coming to Leonardo expecting anything close to what dedicated video-generation tools deliver, temper those expectations significantly β we found it unreliable and clearly behind the curve.
We also noticed the interface has grown more cluttered since Leonardo's acquisition by Canva, with some workflows feeling like they were redesigned without enough user testing behind them.
Leonardo AI makes the most sense for casual creators, hobbyists, and anyone who wants fast, decent-quality still images without committing to Midjourney-level pricing. If you're mostly generating concept art, social content, or experimenting with styles, the free daily credits and quick turnaround make it easy to justify keeping around.
We'd caution anyone relying on it for professional, high-consistency work β think branded character assets or production video β to test thoroughly with a free tier first. Watch your credit balance closely, keep an eye on subscription renewal dates, and don't assume every generation will land on the first try.
Leonardo AI earns its strong reputation on output quality and speed, and we understand why so many people rate it highly after their first few sessions. But the billing friction and inconsistent generation reliability are real enough that we can't call it flawless. It's a strong tool with rough edges that need sanding down β approach it with eyes open on the subscription terms and you'll likely walk away satisfied.
Meta's AI image generation system designed for creative visual generation.
Adobe's generative AI model integrated into the Creative Cloud design ecosystem.
AI image generator known for producing images with accurate typography and text.
A popular AI copywriting tool focused on marketing text, product descriptions and social media content.